Search for: All records

Abstract The Antarctic ice sheet blankets >99% of the continent and limits our ability to study how subglacial geology and topography have evolved through time. Ice-rafted dropstones derived from the Antarctic subglacial continental interior at different times during the late Cenozoic provide valuable thermal history proxies to understand this geologic history. We applied multiple thermochronometers covering a range of closure temperatures (60–800 °C) to 10 dropstones collected during Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) Expedition 318 in order to explore the subglacial geology and thermal and exhumation history of the Wilkes Subglacial Basin. The Wilkes Subglacial Basin is a key target for study because ice-sheet models show it was an area of ice-sheet retreat that significantly contributed to sea-level rise during past warm periods. Depositional ages of dropstones range from early Oligocene to late Pleistocene and have zircon U-Pb or 40Ar/39Ar ages indicating sources from the Mertz shear zone, Adélie craton, Ferrar large igneous province, and Millen schist belt. Dropstones from the Mertz shear zone and Adélie craton experienced three cooling periods (1700–1500 Ma; 500–280 Ma; 34–0 Ma) and two periods of extremely slow cooling rates (1500–500 Ma; 280–34 Ma). Low-temperature thermochronometers from seven of the dropstones record cooling during the Paleozoic, potentially recording the Ross or Pan-African orogenies, and during the Mesozoic, potentially recording late Paleozoic to Mesozoic rifting. These dropstones then resided within ~500 m of the surface since the late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic. In contrast, two dropstones deposited during the mid-Pliocene, one from the Mertz shear zone and one from Adélie craton, show evidence for localized post-Eocene glacial erosion of ≥2 km. 

The Paradox Basin in the Colorado Plateau (USA) has some of the most iconic records of paleofluid flow, including sandstone bleaching and ore mineralization, and hydrocarbon, CO2, and He reservoirs, yet the sources of fluids responsible for these extensive fluid-rock reactions are highly debated. This study, for the first time, characterizes fluids within the basin to constrain the sources and emergent behavior of paleofluid flow resulting in the iconic rock records. Major ion and isotopic (δ18Owater; δDwater; δ18OSO4; δ34SSO4; δ34SH2S; 87Sr/86Sr) signatures of formation waters were used to evaluate the distribution and sources of fluids and water-rock interactions by comparison with the rock record. There are two sources of salinity in basinal fluids: (1) diagenetically altered highly evaporated paleo-seawater-derived brines associated with the Pennsylvanian Paradox Formation evaporites; and (2) dissolution of evaporites by topographically driven meteoric circulation. Fresh to brackish groundwater in the shallow Cretaceous Burro Canyon Formation contains low Cu and high SO4 concentrations and shows oxidation of sulfides by meteoric water, while U concentrations are higher than within other formation waters. Deeper brines in the Pennsylvanian Honaker Trail Formation were derived from evaporated paleo-seawater mixed with meteoric water that oxidized sulfides and dissolved gypsum and have high 87Sr/86Sr indicating interaction with radiogenic siliciclastic minerals. Upward migration of reduced (hydrocarbon- and H2S-bearing) saline fluids from the Pennsylvanian Paradox Formation along faults likely bleached sandstones in shallower sediments and provided a reduced trap for later Cu and U deposition. The distribution of existing fluids in the Paradox Basin provides important constraints to understand the rock record over geological time.